top of page

Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited vs Berger Paints India Limited

Court

NCLAT

Date of Judgement:

September 12, 2024

Citation:

Neutral: 2024 INSC 686

Category:

Section 29A - Extension of time

Facts:

Findings:

December 18, 2024

NCLAT: Can’t challenge nonadmission of claim by RP for first time in appeal

State Tax Officer Vs. Ricoh India Ltd. & Ors.

NCLAT

December 18, 2024

NCLAT: CoC approved resolution plan binds all stakeholders, including dissenting financial creditors

Union Bank of India Vs. Mr. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors.

NCLAT

December 18, 2024

NCLAT: Date of default for personal guarantor depends on terms of
guaranteed contract

Mavjibhai Nagarbhai Patel Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.

NCLAT

December 18, 2024

Supreme Court: Parties can jointly request clarification from an arbitrator, even after, expiry of 30- day period

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs. M/S. S.A. Builders Ltd.

Supreme Court of India

December 17, 2024

NCLAT: Can’t extend CIRP beyond 330 Days u/s 12(3) of IBC unless exceptional circumstances present

Sibanarayan Chhotray Vs. Indian Overseas Bank & Anr.

NCLAT

October 8, 2024

Section 34

Delhi High Court: Parties should be supplied with all materials submitted to the AT, opportunity should be given to respond to such materials. Arbitrator's act of not supplying materials and denying opportunity to respond violates Section 18 of the A&C Act. Arbitral Award set aside.

Flfl Travel Retail Lucknow Private vs Airports Authority Of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court

September 30, 2024

Section 34

Delhi High Court: AT has discretion to grant pre-award interest and/or post-award interest, on either whole or part of the principal amount.

M/S Star Shares & Stock Brokers Ltd vs Praveen Gupta & Anr.

Delhi High Court

September 20, 2024

Section 34

Supreme Court: A plausible view taken by AT based on evidence led by parties cannot be termed perverse.

Opg Power Generation Private Limited vs Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India

Supreme Court of India

September 12, 2024

Section 29A - Extension of time

Supreme Court: Application for extension of the time period for passing an arbitral award - maintainable even after the expiry of the twelve-month or the extended six-month period, as the case may be. While adjudicating such Applications, Courts to be guided by "Principle of sufficient cause" as elaborated in the Judgement.

Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited vs Berger Paints India Limited

Supreme Court of India

Read more

Ratio

Supreme Court: An application for extension of the time period for passing an arbitral award under Section 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) is maintainable even after the expiry of the twelve-month or the extended six-month period, as the case may be. The court while adjudicating such extension applications will be guided by the principle of sufficient cause and observations made in the judgment.

Digital art exhibit

Arbitration Law Updates

bottom of page